Holman v. Clemson University ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1898 ROSLYN HOLMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CLEMSON UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cv-02727-TLW) Submitted: January 29, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roslyn Holman, Appellant Pro Se. James William Logan, Jr., LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, L.L.P., Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roslyn Holman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her employment discrimination action alleging retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holman v. Clemson University, No. 4:05-cv-02727-TLW (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -