Guseh v. NC Central University ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-1433
    JAMES GUSEH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, through the
    Board of Governors of the University of North
    Carolina;   BERNICE   D.   JOHNSON,   in   her
    individual and official capacity as Dean of
    the College of Arts and Sciences of North
    Carolina Central University,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (1:04-cv-00042-JAB)
    Submitted: November 15, 2006              Decided:   November 17, 2006
    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    James Guseh, Appellant Pro Se. John Payne Scherer II, Assistant
    Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    James Guseh appeals the district court’s order accepting*
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his
    employment discrimination action.    We have reviewed the record and
    find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
    stated by the district court.       Guseh v. North Carolina Central
    Univ., No. 1:04-cv-00042-JAB (M.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2006). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    The  district   court   accepted  the   magistrate   judge’s
    recommendation with one exception: the court found that Guseh’s
    claim under the North Carolina Constitution was not barred by
    sovereign immunity, Corum v. Univ. of N.C., 
    413 S.E.2d 276
    , 289-92
    (N.C. 1992), but rather, was barred because such direct
    constitutional claims may only proceed in the absence of an
    alternative state remedy. Id.; Ware v. Fort, 
    478 S.E.2d 218
    , 222
    (N.C. App. 1996).
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-1433

Filed Date: 11/17/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014