Vigue v. Taylor ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6765
JACK RAY VIGUE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN B. TAYLOR; H. PONTON, Assistant Warden,
Operations; MICHAEL A. SHUPE; ANITA KELLY;
CORPORAL ZUMBRO; MR. CLARK; LARRY D. HUFFMAN;
E. C. MORRIS; JAMES E. BRIGGS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BOBBY W. SOLES; MAJOR JONES; CAPTAIN BARKS-
DALE; LIEUTENANT COTRELL; MR. BROWN; LIEU-
TENANT ROBERT WILSON; SERGEANT SMITH,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-95-84-R)
Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack Ray Vigue, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the
district court. With respect to Appellant's claims of denial of ac-
cess to the courts, we note that Appellant failed to show prejudice
to his litigation sufficient to survive summary judgment. Strickler
v. Waters, 989 F.2d 1375, 1383, (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S.
949 (1993); White v. White, 886 F.2d 721 (4th Cir. 1989). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2