White v. Taylor , 88 F. App'x 584 ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7340
BILLY WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT TAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DEAN BROCHARD, Chief Psychologist,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-02-385)
Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy White, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, Philip
Carlton Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Billy White appeals the magistrate judge’s orders denying
his motions for appointment of counsel in his suit under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2000).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
magistrate judge. See White v. Taylor, No. CA-02-385 (E.D. Va.
Sept. 22, 2002; July 24, 2003; Aug. 20, 2003). We also deny
White’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 3 -