Lee v. Clark ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1702
REGINALD LEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEVIN CLARK; JOHN DOE, JR.; RICHARD ROE, Officer, in their
individual and official capacities; BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT;
THEO FLEET, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MARTIN O’MALLEY; DOUGLAS L. PATTERSON; BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL;
CITY OF BALTIMORE; SHEILA DIXON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(1:05-cv-00897-WDQ)
Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 25, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Stakem Hornig, Assistant
Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Donald Sheridan,
William Rowe Phelan, Jr., BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Lee appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lee v. Clark,
No. 1:05-cv-00897-WDQ (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -