Engoulou v. Mukasey , 272 F. App'x 252 ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1673
MIREILLE ESSONG ENGOULOU,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A98-317-657)
Submitted: March 12, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Assistant Attorney
General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, David Schor,
Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mireille Essong Engoulou, a native and citizen of
Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider a
prior order of the Board denying a motion to reopen removal
proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find
no abuse of discretion in the Board’s order. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2007) (standard of review); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d
475, 481, 482-83 (4th Cir. 2006) (same). We therefore deny the
petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In
Re: Essong Engoulou, No. A98-317-657 (B.I.A. June 18, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -