United States v. Brice ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7189
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TERRY LAMAR BRICE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-92-328, CA-95-701)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Lamar Brice, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for reconsideration in this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Brice v. United States, No. CR-92-328; CA-
95-701 (D.S.C. July 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2