Bledson v. Adams , 201 F. App'x 157 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-6935
    QUENTIN BLEDSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    VANESSA ADAMS,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (1:06-cv-00130-GBL)
    Submitted:   August 18, 2006            Decided:   September 28, 2006
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Quentin Bledson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Quentin Bledson, a federal inmate, appeals from the
    district court’s orders dismissing his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     (2000)
    petition for want of administrative exhaustion and denying his
    motion for reconsideration.   We vacate the orders of the district
    court and remand for consideration of the merits of Bledson’s
    claims.
    Bledson was convicted of possession of a hazardous tool.
    He received a variety of sanctions, including the loss of forty
    days’ good conduct time, for this offense.    Bledson appealed the
    decision and asked that the conviction be expunged from his record.
    At each level in the appeals process, the representative of the
    Bureau of Prisons denied Bledson’s appeal, specifically finding
    that “sanctions were” “appropriate.”   We read these administrative
    denials to mean that all the sanctions imposed for the offense,
    including the loss or revocation of good time credits, were before
    each reviewing authority and that the loss of good time credits,
    like all the sanctions, was upheld at each step of the review
    process.   Accordingly, we conclude that Bledson has exhausted his
    administrative remedies.
    We therefore vacate the orders of the district court and
    remand for consideration of the merits of Bledson’s claims.     We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    - 2 -
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    VACATED AND REMANDED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-6935

Citation Numbers: 201 F. App'x 157

Judges: Michael, Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Traxler

Filed Date: 9/28/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023