Robinson v. Padula , 426 F. App'x 208 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-7568
    JOHN BERNARD ROBINSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    ANTHONY PADULA, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution,
    Respondent - Appellee,
    and
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken.   J. Michelle Childs, District Judge.
    (1:09-cv-01977-JMC)
    Submitted:   April 28, 2011                    Decided:   May 2, 2011
    Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John Bernard Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.    Donald John Zelenka,
    Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    John     Bernard      Robinson        seeks        to    appeal       the    district
    court’s    order     accepting     the    recommendation               of       the    magistrate
    judge     and   denying    relief        on       his    
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
         (2006)
    petition.       We    dismiss      the   appeal          for        lack    of    jurisdiction
    because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
    Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of
    the     district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
    the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
    appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).                                     “[T]he timely
    filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
    requirement.”        Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court’s judgment was entered on September
    15, 2010, and the notice of appeal was deposited in the prison’s
    internal mail system on October 20, 2010.                            See Fed. R. App. P.
    4(c);    Houston     v.   Lack,    
    487 U.S. 266
    ,    276        (1988).        Because
    Robinson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain
    an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the
    appeal.     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions      are     adequately        presented              in    the    materials
    before    the   court     and   argument          would    not        aid       the    decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-7568

Citation Numbers: 426 F. App'x 208

Judges: Davis, Keenan, Per Curiam, Wynn

Filed Date: 5/2/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023