Truesdale v. Ashcroft , 203 F. App'x 533 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-7092
    ALVIN BERNARD TRUESDALE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN D. ASHCROFT; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS;
    HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director; R. E. HOLT,
    Southeast Regional Director for Federal Bureau
    of Prisons; JOSEPH V. SMITH, Warden; OFFICER
    BROOKS, Unit Manager at FCI-Edgefield; D.
    TAYLOR, Case Manager at FCI-Edgefield; JOHN
    DOE; JANE DOE, I,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.   David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (8:05-cv-00078-DCN)
    Submitted: October 17, 2006                 Decided: October 23, 2006
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Alvin Bernard Truesdale, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    Alvin Bernard Truesdale appeals the district court’s
    orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
    Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
    (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration.        We have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we
    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.   Truesdale v.
    Ashcroft, No. 8:05-cv-00078-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 30 & Apr. 21,
    2006).   We deny Truesdale’s pending motions to disqualify the
    Defendants’ counsel, to appoint counsel for him, to hold these
    proceedings in abeyance or to compel, for a conference, and for
    publication of the opinion in this case.    We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-7092

Citation Numbers: 203 F. App'x 533

Judges: Duncan, King, Niemeyer, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 10/23/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023