Kimberly Mallett v. Disney Enterprises ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 22-1028      Doc: 11         Filed: 04/19/2022    Pg: 1 of 2
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 22-1028
    KIMBERLY MALLETT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DISNEY ENTERPRISES,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:21-cv-00616-RDA-JFA)
    Submitted: April 14, 2022                                         Decided: April 19, 2022
    Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kimberly Mallett, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-1028      Doc: 11         Filed: 04/19/2022     Pg: 2 of 2
    PER CURIAM:
    Kimberly Mallett appeals the district court’s order striking her amended complaint. *
    On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir.
    R. 34(b). Because Mallett’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
    court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. See
    Jackson v. Lightsey, 
    775 F.3d 170
    , 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
    document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
    brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Mallett v. Disney Enters.,
    No. 1:21-cv-00616-RDA-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2021). We deny Mallett’s motions to
    appoint counsel and for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    To the extent Mallett seeks to appeal the district court’s November 24, 2021, order
    dismissing her original complaint, the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and we therefore
    dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007) (“[T]he
    timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1028

Filed Date: 4/19/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/28/2022