Riying Wang v. Loretta Lynch , 672 F. App'x 319 ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1666
RIYING WANG,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: December 16, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Riying Wang, Petitioner Pro Se. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Briena L. Stippoli, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Karen L. Melnik, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION
LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Riying Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic
of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the
Immigration Judge’s denial of his requests for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record,
including the transcript of Wang’s merits hearings and all
supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does
not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual
findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, INS v.
Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re Wang (B.I.A. May 16,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2