Helen Dale v. MD Dep't of Transportation , 672 F. App'x 323 ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1158
HELEN DALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MARYLAND TRANSIT
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-00191-ELH)
Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: January 11, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian
E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Eric
S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Helen Dale appeals the district court’s order granting the
Maryland Department of Transportation’s and the Maryland
Transportation Administration’s motion to dismiss Dale’s race
and gender discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); age
discrimination claims, brought pursuant to the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended,
29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); and unlawful
employment practices claims, brought pursuant to the Maryland
Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20-
606(a)(1)(i) (West 2014). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Dale v. Md. Dep’t of Transp.,
No. 1:13-cv-00191-ELH (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2