United States v. Davis Barton ( 2022 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6460 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6460
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVIS BARTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 22-6461
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVIS BARTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:11-cr-00349-TDS-1; 1:12-cr-
00255-TDS-1)
Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 23, 2022
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6460 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Davis Barton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6460 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Davis Barton appeals the district court’s orders denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motions for compassionate release and denying
reconsideration. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for
abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142
S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse
its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See United States v.
High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for
denial of compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. United States v. Barton, Nos. 1:11-cr-00349-TDS-1, 1:12-cr-00255-TDS-1
(M.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2022; Jan. 27, 2022; Mar. 17, 2022). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3