Bolls v. Street , 417 F. App'x 313 ( 2011 )

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Bolls’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolls v. Street, No. 3:10-cv-00550-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2010) & 2010 WL 5211481 (Dec. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.