-
*363 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lester Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,- we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardy v. Bennett, No. 5:08-ct-03044-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 08-8432
Citation Numbers: 317 F. App'x 362
Judges: Hamilton, Motz, Shedd
Filed Date: 3/17/2009
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2022