Michael Hunt, Jr. v. N.C. Dep't of Public Safety , 688 F. App'x 232 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-7660
    MICHAEL HARRISON HUNT, JR.,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
    Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-01156-WO-LPA)
    Submitted: April 27, 2017                                          Decided: May 9, 2017
    Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Harrison Hunt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Harrison Hunt seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on
    his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate
    judge pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended
    dismissing the petition as successive and advised Hunt that failure to file timely objections
    to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon
    the recommendation.
    The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
    necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the
    parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 
    474 U.S. 140
     (1985). Hunt has
    waived appellate review by failing to file objections. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-7660

Citation Numbers: 688 F. App'x 232

Filed Date: 5/9/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023