Robert Johnson v. Drew Stanley ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 19-7702
    ROBERT H. JOHNSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    DREW STANLEY, Superintendent, Warren Correctional Institution,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
    Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:18-cv-00144-FDW)
    Submitted: January 21, 2020                                       Decided: January 24, 2020
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert H. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Robert H. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary
    judgment in favor of Respondent and denying relief on Johnson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018)
    petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
    not timely filed.
    Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment
    or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
    appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.
    App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
    requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 30, 2019. The
    notice of appeal was filed on November 5, 2019. * Because Johnson failed to file a timely
    notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the
    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of
    appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for
    mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 
    487 U.S. 266
    (1988).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-7702

Filed Date: 1/24/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/24/2020