United States v. Jeffery Okyere ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-6071
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JEFFERY OKYERE, a/k/a Jeffrey Okyere,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00159-LO-1; 1:19-cv-00146-LO)
    Submitted: April 16, 2020                                         Decided: April 21, 2020
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jeffery Okyere, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jeffery Okyere seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge
    issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate
    of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
    right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits,
    a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the
    district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
    Davis, 
    137 S. Ct. 759
    , 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural
    grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is
    debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
    Gonzalez v. Thaler, 
    565 U.S. 134
    , 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    ,
    484 (2000)).
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Okyere has not made
    the requisite showing.     Accordingly, we deny Okyere’s motion for a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-6071

Filed Date: 4/21/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/21/2020