Terry v. Veltri ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 03-7020
    GARY IVAN TERRY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DARLENE A. VELTRI, Warden; JEFF TILLEY,
    Discipline Hearing Officer; RODNEY TABRON,
    Unit Manager; TONY PARKS, Senior Correctional
    Officer; THERESA WOODS, Senior Correctional
    Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-02-697-5-F)
    Submitted:   January 30, 2004          Decided:     February 24, 2004
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gary Ivan Terry, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Gary   Ivan   Terry   appeals    the   district     court’s   order
    dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
    Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
     (1971), for
    failure to exhaust administrative remedies.                The district court
    properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42
    U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Terry did not demonstrate to the
    district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or
    that such remedies were not available, the court’s dismissal of the
    action was not an abuse of discretion.           Terry may refile his action
    after exhaustion; therefore, we modify the dismissal to be without
    prejudice.      See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2106
     (2000).             Accordingly, we grant
    leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s
    order as modified.          We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts   and    legal   contentions    are     adequately    presented    in   the
    materials     before    the   court   and     argument    would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-7020

Filed Date: 2/24/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014