Reinaldo Olavarria v. Roy Cooper ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                      UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-1526
    REINALDO OLAVARRIA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ROY COOPER, Governor; BARBARA GIBSON, Director of North Carolina
    Human Resources; MARK MARTIN, Chief Justice; CHARLTON A. ALLEN,
    Chair of the North Carolina Industrial Commission; ZACHARY PADGET; RANA
    BADWIN, in her Official Capacity; ALEXANDER WALTON, in his Official
    Capacity; ERIKA FRAZIER, in her Official Capacity; MANDY COHEN, NCDHHS
    Secretary,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
    Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-cv-00590-D)
    Submitted: September 22, 2020                                   Decided: October 2, 2020
    Before KING, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Reinaldo Olavarria, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Reinaldo Olavarria appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ post-
    remand motions to dismiss Olavarria’s civil claims against the State of North Carolina and
    several public officials. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Olavarria v.
    Cooper, No. 5:17-cv-00590-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    We previously remanded this matter to the district court for further consideration
    in light of Fort Bend Cnty., Tx. v. Davis, 
    139 S. Ct. 1843
     (2019). See Olavarria v. Cooper,
    776 F. App’x 128 (4th Cir. 2019) (No. 19-1536). Defendants filed new motions to dismiss
    on remand and the district court granted the motions, in part, and dismissed the action
    without prejudice. Although the district court’s dismissal was without prejudice, we have
    jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 
    959 F.3d 605
    , 615 (4th Cir.
    2020).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1526

Filed Date: 10/2/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/2/2020