Supreme Ackbar v. Scott Lewis ( 2020 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6358
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ROBERT L. MITCHELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT LEWIS; C. HINDENBURG; OFFICER JACOBS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:19-cv-02045-RMG)
Submitted: August 31, 2020 Decided: November 5, 2020
Before KEENAN, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ackbar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ackbar v. Lewis, No. 4:19-cv-02045-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2020). We deny Ackbar’s
motion to vacate the district court’s opinion and judgment and his supplemental motion to
vacate the district court’s opinion and judgment and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2