Supreme Ackbar v. Christopher Monaco ( 2020 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6398
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER MONACO; AGENT MARTIN; OFFICER BOCCABELLO;
RIVERA LOPEZ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:19-cv-02774-RMG)
Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: November 9, 2020
Before KEENAN, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ackbar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ackbar v. Monaco, No. 4:19-cv-02774-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2020). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2