Curtis King v. Arthur Burton ( 2021 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7682
CURTIS LAMAR KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ASSOCIATE WARDEN ARTHUR BURTON; BRYAN STIRLING; MARY
MONTOUTH, Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (0:18-cv-02856-BHH)
Submitted: March 23, 2021 Decided: March 29, 2021
Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis L. King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis L. King appeals from the district court’s order adopting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Defendant Burton without prejudice based on
King’s failure to effect proper service and granting summary judgment to the remaining
Defendants in King’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. King v. Burton, No. 0:18-cv-02856-BHH (D.S.C. Sept 24, 2020). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2