Jenny Zambrano v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. ( 2011 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1724
JENNY ZAMBRANO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HSBC BANK USA, N.A., as Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated August 1, 2006, Fremont Home Loan
Trust 2006-B; FREMONT HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-B; LITTON LOAN
SERVICING LP; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Investor,
Individually and as Trust Administrator, Jointly and
Severally; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM,
INCORPORATED; GLASSER AND GLASSER PLC; JOHN DOE,
Certificate Holders I-M, Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-B;
JANE DOE, Certificate Holders I-M, Fremont Home Loan Trust
2006-B; JACK DOE, Certificate Holders I-M; JILL DOE,
Certificate Holders I-M; QUI CHI DOE, Association,
Corporations/entities I-M,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN CORPORATION, a/k/a Fremont
Reorganizing Corporation; NECTAR PROJECTS, INCORPORATED;
LONG & NEYHART PC, now known as Neyhart, Robertson &
McConnell, P.C.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00996-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: August 3, 2011 Decided: August 16, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher E. Brown, R. Michael Smith, BROWN, BROWN & BROWN,
P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. John C. Lynch,
TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S.
Hubbard, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Jenny Zambrano appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing her several claims against Defendants, including her
state law claims for declaratory judgment and quiet title, and
her claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15
U.S.C.A. §§ 1692-1692p (West 2009 & Supp. 2011), the Truth in
Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1601-1667f (West 2009 & Supp. 2011),
and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See
Zambrano v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. 1:09-cv-00996-CMH-IDD (E.D.
Va. Nov. 9, 2009; May 26, 2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of
N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3