Yuri Stoyanov v. Carlos Del Toro ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 21-2222
    YURI J. STOYANOV,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy United States Department of the Navy;
    JAMES H. KING, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70
    Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; KEVIN M. WILSON,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74 Carderock Division
    Naval Surface Warfare Center; DAVID L. MAYO, Individually and in his Official
    Capacity as the Head of Code 743 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare
    Center; MARK THOMAS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as EEO Chief
    and Commander of Code 00 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center;
    DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel
    Code 39 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; JACK K.
    TEMPLETON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 20
    Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; KENNETH GOLDMAN,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 71 Carderock Division
    Naval Surface Warfare Center; CATHERINE L. KESSMEIER, Individually and in
    her Official Capacity as Counsel of Code 004 Carderock Division Naval Surface
    Warfare Center; KENNETH FORMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
    Head of Code 73 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; SAM HAN,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 74 Carderock Division
    Naval Surface Warfare Center; CIRO MINOPOLI, Individually and in his Official
    Capacity as Head of Code 75 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center;
    WILLIAM SNYDER, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 20
    Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; M. WADE, Individually and in
    his Official Capacity as Head of Code 21 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare
    Center; M. J. BABERICH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Head of Code
    64 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; BRUCE CROCK,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 741 Carderock Division
    Naval Surface Warfare Center; WILLIAM MARTIN, Individually and in his Official
    Capacity as Head of Code 722 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center;
    CHARLES R. REEVES, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Product Area
    Director of Code 09 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; L.
    MURPHY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 22 Carderock
    Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; DAVID WINTER, Former Secretary of the
    Navy U.S. Department of the Navy; GARY ROGHEAD, Individually and in his
    Official Capacity as Chief of Navy Operations; ARCHER MACY, Individually and
    in his Official Capacity as Commander of NSWC; PAUL E. SULLIVAN,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as Commander of SEA 00; MERRICK B.
    GARLAND, Attorney General; ROBERT K. HUR, U.S. Attorney; MARGARET W.
    LONG, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Administrative/Technical
    Specialist Code 39; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
    the Head of Code 70; GARTH JENSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
    Deputy Head of Code 70; MIKE MULLEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity
    as Chief of Naval Operations; ELAINE B. MCKINNEY, Individually and in her
    Official Capacity as Deputy EEO Chief Code 004; WAYNE WEIKERT,
    Individually and in her Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70; CHRIS D.
    MEYER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as EEO Chief and Commander
    of Code 00; JEROME CARRUBBA, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
    Security Manager of Code 03; NEACLESA ANDERSON, Individually and in her
    Official Capacity as general Counsel of Code 04; JOSEPH VIGNALLI, Individually
    and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7204; PAUL SHANG, Individually
    and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 707; SUN HAN, Individually and
    in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74; ROBERT WINGO, Individually
    and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7502; ROBERT KOLLARS,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7102; JAMES
    SHANNON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of NSWC; KEVIN
    MCCOY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of NAVSEA; GARY
    ROUGHHEAD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Naval
    Operations; BARBARA REDINGER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as
    Security Manager Code 40; E. CAHILL, Ms., Individually and in her Official
    Capacity as Head of Workforce Relations Branch Code 39,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-03479-CCB)
    Submitted: April 26, 2022                                      Decided: April 28, 2022
    2
    Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    3
    PER CURIAM:
    Yuri J. Stoyanov seeks to appeal the district court’s orders (1) denying Stoyanov’s
    self-styled “Fifth Urgent Motion for Discovery, Depositions of Witnesses/Defendants and
    Criminal Investigation into Federal Crimes” (“Fifth Motion”); (2) denying reconsideration
    of the court’s order denying the Fifth Motion; and (3) granting Stoyanov’s motion for
    extension of time to respond to Defendants’ dispositive motion, but denying his motion to
    transfer. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and
    certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
    ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
    v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949). The orders Stoyanov seeks
    to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-2222

Filed Date: 4/28/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/28/2022