Daryl Green v. Prince George's County Office of Child Support ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1705 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1705
DARYL ANTHONY GREEN,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT; PRINCE GEORGE’S
COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT,
Creditors - Appellees,
and
TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:21-cv-02441-PJM)
Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl Anthony Green, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney
General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland; Timothy P. Branigan, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Laurel,
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1705 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
Maryland for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1705 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Daryl Anthony Green appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing his appeal
from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, and
(2) imposing a prefiling injunction against him. With respect to the dismissal order, we
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed.
R. Bankr. P. 8003(a)(2); In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir. 1995); In re Serra
Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir. 1992). We also find no abuse of discretion
by the district court in imposing monetary sanctions and a prefiling injunction upon finding
that Green engaged in abusive, repetitive, and vexatious bankruptcy filings. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Green v. Prince George’s Cnty. Ofc. of Child Support,
No. 8:21-cv-02441-PJM (D. Md. June 16, 2022).
We deny Green’s motions: for an extension of time to file transcripts and to amend
his informal brief; to address his appeals from the dismissal of two other bankruptcy court
actions; for judicial notice, to strike the sanctions order, and for leave to file federal
litigation; and for a stay pending appeal and a preliminary injunction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3