Richard Pridgen v. Toyin Suarau ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                      UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 21-7516
    RICHARD PRIDGEN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    TOYIN SUARAU; TODD E. ISHEE; BRANDESHAWN HARRIS; KELLI
    HARRIS; DR. MARTA KALINSKI; MR. WILLS; MR. BOYKIN; KIMBERLY
    SHEARIN; DR. DOWNS; HUNTER SMITH; SGT. ADAMS; NURSING STAFF,
    Scotland Correctional Inst.; DR. STEWART,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
    Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03248-D)
    Submitted: April 26, 2022                                         Decided: April 29, 2022
    Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Pridgen, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Richard Pridgen seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his claims as
    to some, but not all, of the named defendants in the underlying 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action.
    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and certain
    interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
    ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949). The order Pridgen seeks to
    appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-7516

Filed Date: 4/29/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/29/2022