Luz Negron-Bennett v. Jason McCandless ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-2366
    LUZ DENISE NEGRON-BENNETT; SALIM BENNETT,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    and
    SALIM A. BENNETT,
    v.
    JASON LEE MCCANDLESS, in his individual and official
    capacities; ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT; JAQUE L. TUCK, in
    her individual and official capacities; RENEE ANDREA
    PERRIER, in her individual and official capacities; SHERRI
    BROTHERS, in her individual and official capacities; SARAH
    GORTENBURG, in her individual and official capacities;
    MARJORIE BROWN, in her individual and official capacities;
    LAKEISHA FLORES, in her individual and official capacities;
    VALERIE CUFFEE, in her individual and official capacities;
    TABATHA KELLY, in her individual and official capacities;
    HEATHER CARTER-STOWE, in her individual and official
    capacities; SUSANNE EISNER, in her individual and official
    capacities; JONNISE CONANAN, in her individual and official
    capacities; ARA TRAMBLIAN, in his individual and official
    capacities; STEPHEN MACISAAC, in his individual and official
    capacities; MOLLY HUTZELL NEWTON, in her individual and
    official capacities; FRANK FRIO, in his individual and
    official capacities; THEOPHANI STAMOS, in his individual and
    official capacities; RICHARD TRODDEN, in his individual and
    official capacities; ELISEO PILCO, in his individual and
    official capacities; JOSEPH HAGGERTY, in his individual and
    official capacities; MICHELE SAUPP, in her individual and
    official capacities; JOHN BAMFORD, in his individual and
    official capacities; BRYNN BENNETT, in his individual and
    official capacities; BRYAN ADAMS, in his individual and
    official capacities; DANIEL SMALDORE, in his individual and
    official capacities; KIMBERLY SWEENEY, in her individual and
    official capacities; JEREMY STRITZINGER, in his individual
    and   official capacities; M. DOUGLAS SCOTT, in his individual
    and   official capacities; JOANNE HAMILTON, in her individual
    and   official capacities; CHARLES ATAKORA; ALISSA GREEN, in
    her   individual and official capacities,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    ARLINGTON COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY; ARLINGTON
    COUNTY COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; ARLINGTON COUNTY
    POLICE DEPARTMENT; ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
    SERVICES; TAMMEE ALSUP GAYMON, in her individual and
    official capacities; ALYSSA GREEN, in her individual and
    official capacities; LAURA RAGGINS, in her individual and
    official capacities; DR. STEPHANIE TEBOR, in her individual
    and official capacities; JOHN DOE, other unknown employees
    and supervisors of said employees and above named employees
    with the Arlington County Children DHS, in his individual
    and official capacities; JANE DOE, other unknown employees
    and supervisors of said employees and above named employees
    with the Arlington County Children DHS, in her individual
    and official capacities; JOHN DOE, unknown employees and
    supervisors of said employees and above named employees with
    the Arlington County Attorney’s Office, in his individual
    and official capacities; JANE DOE, unknown employees and
    supervisors of said employees and above named employees with
    the Arlington County Attorney’s Office, in her individual
    and official capacities; JOHN DOE, Assistant Commonwealth
    Attorney, in his/her individual and official capacities;
    JOHN DOE, unknown employees and supervisors of said
    employees and above named employees with the Arlington
    County Commonwealth’s Attorney Office, in his individual and
    official capacities; JANE DOE, unknown employees and
    supervisors of said employees and above named employees with
    the Arlington County Commonwealth’s Attorney Office, in her
    individual and official capacities; CHARLES ATAKORD, in his
    individual and official capacities; WILSON MEYER, in his
    individual and official capacities; ROBERT ICOLARI, in his
    individual and official capacities; JOHN DOE, Supervisors
    and Supervisors of above named Officers are other unknown
    Officers with the Arlington County Police Department, in
    his/her individual and official capacities; JOHN DOE, other
    unknown employees and supervisors of said employees and
    above named employees with the Arlington County, in his/her
    individual and official capacities; JANE DOE, other unknown
    employees and supervisors of said employees and above named
    2
    employees with the Arlington County, in his/her individual
    and official capacities,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (1:13-cv-00387-JCC-JFA)
    Submitted:   May 22, 2014                        Decided:    May 28, 2014
    Before TRAXLER,   Chief     Judge,   and   HAMILTON   and   DAVIS,   Senior
    Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Luz Denise Negron-Bennett; Salim A. Bennett, Appellants Pro Se.
    Susan  Dudley   Stout,   COUNTY  ATTORNEY’S   OFFICE,  Arlington,
    Virginia; John J. Brandt, Eric Patrick Burns, WILSON ELSER
    MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    3
    PER CURIAM:
    Luz Denise Negron-Bennett and her husband, Salim A.
    Bennett, appeal the district court’s order dismissing without
    prejudice their 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2006) action for noncompliance
    with the court’s earlier order instructing them to particularize
    their complaint.         Here, the plaintiffs failed to particularize
    their    inscrutable     complaint,    as   thoroughly     directed    by     the
    district court, which also warned them that failure to comply
    with its order could result in dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P.
    41(b).    We review a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b)
    for abuse of discretion.        Ballard v. Carlson, 
    882 F.2d 93
    , 95–96
    (4th    Cir.    1989).    We   have   reviewed   the    record   and   find    no
    reversible error.        Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the district court.         Negron-Bennett v. McCandless, No. 1:13-
    cv-00387-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2013).              We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-2366

Filed Date: 5/28/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021