Consuelo Romero-Arevalo v. Merrick Garland ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 22-1966      Doc: 24         Filed: 05/11/2023    Pg: 1 of 2
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 22-1966
    CONSUELO MARIA ROMERO-AREVALO,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    MERRICK B. GARLAND,
    Respondent.
    On Appeal from an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted: March 14, 2023                                         Decided: May 11, 2023
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    ON BRIEF: Jose Rafael Campos, LAW OFFICES OF CAMPOS & ASSOCIATES,
    Wheaton, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant
    Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director, Abigail E. Leach, Office of
    Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-1966      Doc: 24         Filed: 05/11/2023      Pg: 2 of 2
    PER CURIAM:
    Consuelo Maria Romero-Arevalo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
    review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal
    from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of
    removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).                We have
    thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling
    contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (b)(4)(B), and
    that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by
    the Board. In re Romero-Arevalo (B.I.A. Aug. 18, 2022). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1966

Filed Date: 5/11/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/12/2023