James Aursby v. Kyle Richardson ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7103 Doc: 54 Filed: 05/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7103
JAMES R. AURSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KYLE THOMAS RICHARDSON; IRENE PAYNE HYRE; HIRAM
MACPHERSON; STEVEN HERRICK; KYLE ALEXANDER SMITH;
GREGORY BRIAN SAATHOFF; STEVE CLINK; DAVID SMITH; HAROLD W.
CLARKE; CHEVROLET, INC.; DAMERON, R.N.; WOODSON, Warden; D.
GREGORY, N.R.C.; P. WHITE, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:21-cv-00339-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: May 23, 2023 Decided: May 25, 2023
Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James R. Aursby, Appellant Pro Se. Taylor Denslow Brewer, MORAN, REEVES &
CONN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7103 Doc: 54 Filed: 05/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James R. Aursby appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983amended complaint, in which he alleged claims of deliberate indifference, in violation of
the Eighth Amendment, and state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Aursby v. Richardson,
No. 7:21-cv-00339-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Sept. 6, 2022). We deny Aursby’s motions to
appoint counsel and for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2