Nationwide General Insurance Company v. Brian Staples ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 22-2061      Doc: 17        Filed: 05/22/2023   Pg: 1 of 3
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 22-2061
    NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE                     COMPANY;          NATIONWIDE
    MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Plaintiffs - Appellees,
    v.
    BRIAN A. STAPLES,
    Defendant - Appellant,
    and
    NORMAN C. STEVENS,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00401-AWA-RJK)
    Submitted: May 18, 2023                                        Decided: May 22, 2023
    Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    ON BRIEF: Brian N. Casey, CLARKE, DOLPH, HULL & BRUNICK, PLC, Virginia
    Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Shawn A. Voyles, MCKENRY, DANCIGERS,
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-2061      Doc: 17         Filed: 05/22/2023    Pg: 2 of 3
    DAWSON, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-2061      Doc: 17         Filed: 05/22/2023      Pg: 3 of 3
    PER CURIAM:
    Brian Staples seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Nationwide General
    Insurance Company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and declaring that Nationwide
    General had no coverage obligations to Staples in a state court proceeding. However, the
    court’s order also declined to grant judgment on the pleadings for a second plaintiff
    insurance company, and the case remains pending in the district court. This court may
    exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and certain interlocutory and
    collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
    ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
    Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949). The order Staples seeks to appeal is neither a final
    order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-2061

Filed Date: 5/22/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/23/2023