Tigress McDaniel v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Black Political Caucus ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1051 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1051
TIGRESS MCDANIEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG BLACK POLITICAL CAUCUS OF
CHARLOTTE; MEKO CHOSEN; DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. David Shepardson Cayer, Magistrate Judge. (3:22-cv-00236-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1051 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tigress McDaniel appeals the magistrate judge’s postjudgment text order denying
McDaniel’s as-construed motion to amend her previously dismissed complaint. We
discern no abuse of discretion in the magistrate judge’s ruling, given that McDaniel did not
proffer the proposed amended complaint or otherwise address how she would remedy the
previously identified jurisdictional defects. See Willner v. Dimon, 849 F.3d 93, 114 (4th
Cir. 2017) (“Where, as here, the plaintiff fails to formally move to amend and fails to
provide the district court with any proposed amended complaint or other indication of the
amendments [s]he wishes to make, the district court does not abuse its discretion in denying
leave to amend.” (brackets omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm the appealed-from order.
McDaniel v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Black Pol. Caucus of Charlotte, No. 3:22-cv-00236-
MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2