Ronald Emrit v. British Secret Service ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1172 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1172
RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRITISH SECRET SERVICE; CENTRAL AUTHORITY OF ENGLAND;
HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE LITIGATION; OFFICE OF
INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE; HOUSE OF LORDS
(ENGLAND); HOUSE OF COMMONS (ENGLAND); PRIME MINISTER
RISHI; THE WINDSORS; BUCKINGHAM PALACE; ARCHBISHOP OF
CANTERBURY; BLETCHLEY PARK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00180-JRR)
Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 21, 2023
Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1172 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Emrit’s informal brief
does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)
(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is
limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2