Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7343 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7343
MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WASHAVA MOYE, officially as Interim Director of Alvin S. Glen Detention
Center (“ASGDC”), for injunctive relief and declaratory relief, and individually for
damages; DONALD JOHN ZELENKA, officially as Deputy Attorney General of
South Carolina (“SCAG”) and as Chief of SCAG’s office’s Criminal Division,
officially for declaratory and injunctive relief, and individually for damages; ALL
OTHER UNKNOWN-NAMES PERSONS, who injured and/or conspired to injured
Plaintiff; SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages; HENRY
DARGAN MCMASTER, solely officially as Governor of South Carolina (“SC”),
and solely for declaratory and injunctive relief,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-02018-TLW)
Submitted: July 20, 2023 Decided: July 24, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7343 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7343 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/24/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendations to (1) deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motion for a temporary
restraining order; and (2) dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 review, Assa’ad-Faltas’ 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal
brief and in the Appellant’s objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendations. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b); see also Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017). We have
reviewed the record in conjunction with the preserved issues and have found no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Assa’ad-Faltas v. Moye, No.
3:22-cv-02018-TLW (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2022). We deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motions for
appointment of counsel, to file a formal brief, for an extension of time to file a formal brief,
and to file a supplemental brief and appendix, as well as her request to transfer this matter
to a different district judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3