Strassini v. Tadlock , 86 F. App'x 601 ( 2004 )

PER CURIAM.

John D. Strassini appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders: (1) denying confirmation of his Chapter 13 plan, and (2) dismissing a petition filed by Strassini’s former wife. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Strassini v. Tadlock, Nos. CA-00-73-3-V; BK-99-32153; BK-00-30030 (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 26, 2002 and entered Sept. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED