James Widtfeldt v. James Daugherty , 587 F. App'x 992 ( 2014 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1907
___________________________
James A. Widtfeldt
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
James Daugherty, Revenue Officer; Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Treasury
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: December 11, 2014
Filed: December 16, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
James Widtfeldt appeals the district court’s1 without-prejudice dismissal of his
pro se civil action for failure to prosecute. Upon careful review, we conclude that the
1
The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.
district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice,
because Widtfeldt failed to establish that he had properly effectuated service against
defendants within 120 days after filing his complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m);
Bullock v. United States, 160 F.3d 441, 442 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (standard
of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-