In re F.A. CA1/3 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/16/14 In re F.A. CA1/3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION THREE
    In re F.A., a Person Coming Under the
    Juvenile Court Law.
    THE PEOPLE,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.                                                                   A142264
    F.A.,
    (Contra Costa County
    Defendant and Appellant.                                    Super. Ct. No. J11-00741)
    F. A. appeals from an order continuing him as a ward of the juvenile court and
    ordering his out of home placement. His court-appointed counsel has filed a brief
    seeking our independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
     to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. We conclude
    there are no issues requiring further review and affirm.
    DISCUSSION
    F.A. first came under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court in 2011, when he
    entered a no contest plea to allegations that he committed an assault with a deadly
    weapon. He was placed on probation in his mother’s custody. His record on probation
    has been poor. Following his third violation of probation in October 2012, F.A. was
    committed to the county’s ranch program for 90 days. After his release from that
    1
    commitment, F.A. violated his probation three more times. He remained in his mother’s
    custody.
    This is F.A.’s seventh violation of probation. He admitted the allegations. Based
    upon our review of the record, we have no reason to question the sufficiency of the
    court’s advisements, F.A.’s waivers of his rights or his admission to the charges. His
    admission appears knowing and voluntary.
    In light of F.A.’s poor performance on probation in his mother’s custody, the court
    determined that F.A.’s welfare required his removal from the family home for a period of
    detention. He was placed in juvenile hall pending a court approved placement. His
    maximum custody time was set at 144 days.
    F.A.’s counsel has represented to us that she advised F.A. of her intention to file a
    Wende brief in this case and of F.A.’s right to submit supplemental argument on his own
    behalf. He has not done so.
    There was no error. Our full review of the record discloses no issues that require
    further briefing.
    DISPOSITION
    The order is affirmed.
    _________________________
    Siggins, J.
    We concur:
    _________________________
    McGuiness, P.J.
    _________________________
    Pollak, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A142264

Filed Date: 12/16/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021