-
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before ZOLPER, COOK, and CONN Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Specialist TIMOTHY R. VECCHIONE United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20080115 Headquarters, 8th Theater Sustainment Command Donna M. Wright, Military Judge Colonel James W. Herring, Jr., Staff Judge Advocate For Appellant: Major Grace M. Gallagher, JA; Captain Candace N. White Halverson, JA. For Appellee: Pursuant to A.C.C.A. Rule 15.2, no response filed. 20 November 2008 --------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSTION --------------------------------- Per Curiam: A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, in accordance with his pleas, of absence without leave, wrongful use of methamphetamine (three specifications) and cocaine, and making checks without sufficient funds (three specifications), in violation of Articles 86, 112a and 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ],
10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 912a, and 923a. The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for fifteen months, reduction to E1, and awarded appellant one-hundred-seventy-four days of credit against the sentence to confinement. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence, appropriately crediting one-hundred-seventy- four days against the term of confinement. The case is before the court for review pursuant to Article 66(c), UCMJ. Appellant’s brief does not admit that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and submits the case upon its merits, without any assigned errors. However, in a footnote, appellant states that: In Specification 2 of Additional Charge I, appellant is charged with and convicted of writing a number of fraudulent checks from his First Hawaiian Bank account. (R. at Charge Sheet) Despite the stipulation of fact and appellant’s colloquy with the military judge, check 118, written on 7 August 2007 for $1,265.96 was actually drawn on an account with Central Pacific Bank. (R. at Pros. Ex. 1) Appellant asserts no prejudice as a result of this error. Specification 2 of Additional Charge I identified six checks, including check 118, all over $500.00, made by the accused, and drawn on First Hawaiian Bank. During the providence inquiry, appellant admitted to writing these six checks for the amounts listed and on the dates indicated. Appellant specifically stated that he wrote each check on his First Hawaiian Bank account and that the account was an open account with no money in it. Despite having a copy of check 118 attached to the stipulation of fact, clearly identifying Central Pacific Bank as the drawee bank and that the account upon which check 118 was drawn was closed, none of the parties to the trial noted or discussed these discrepancies at any time during appellant’s trial.[1] While appellant asserts no prejudice, and in the absence of a government reply brief, we find it both prudent[2] and judicially economical to except out check 118 from Specification 2 of Additional Charge I. Accordingly, we will grant appropriate relief in our decretal paragraph. Specification 2 of Additional Charge I is amended by deleting the words and figures “7 August 2007 118 $1,265.96 First Hawaiian Bank.” The finding of guilty of Specification 2 of Additional Charge I, as amended, is affirmed. The remaining findings of guilty are affirmed. Reassessing the sentence under the principles of United States v. Sales,
22 M.J. 305(C.M.A. 1986), and on the basis of the error noted and the entire record, the court affirms the sentence. FOR THE COURT: MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. Clerk of Court ----------------------- [1] Check 118 was stamped “RETURN REASON D-D CLOSED ACCOUNT” while all other checks alleged in Specification 2 and drawn on First Hawaiian Bank were stamped “RETURN REASON-S REFER TO MAKER”. [2] See generally U.S. v. White,
22 C.M.R. 730(C.G.C.M.R. 1956) (Holding that omission of a drawee bank creates a fatally defective specification.) While we have found no case directly on point, it may be debatable whether misidentification of a drawee bank creates a fatally defective specification.
Document Info
Docket Number: ARMY 20080115
Filed Date: 11/20/2008
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021