United States v. Jaime Martinez-Aleman , 706 F. App'x 816 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 16-51400      Document: 00514129912         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/24/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 16-51400
    Fif h Circuit
    FILED
    Summary Calendar                            August 24, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JAIME ENRIQUE MARTINEZ-ALEMAN,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:16-CR-37-1
    Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Jaime Enrique Martinez-Aleman is serving a 121-month sentence after
    he conditionally pleaded guilty to possessing intending to distribute 50 grams
    or more of methamphetamine and 50 grams or more but less than five
    kilograms of cocaine. Border patrol agents found the drugs in the engine of
    Martinez-Aleman’s truck after an agent stopped him during a roving border
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-51400    Document: 00514129912     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/24/2017
    No. 16-51400
    patrol. Martinez-Aleman argues that the district court erred in denying his
    motion to suppress this evidence, contending that the agent who stopped his
    truck lacked reasonable suspicion that it was involved in illegal activity. We
    review de novo the court’s decision to deny the motion, viewing the evidence in
    the light most favorable to the Government, the prevailing party. See United
    States v. Cervantes, 
    797 F.3d 326
    , 328 (5th Cir. 2015).
    In light of the applicable factors, the totality of the circumstances
    supports the finding that the agent had reasonable suspicion to stop Martinez-
    Aleman’s truck. See United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 
    422 U.S. 873
    , 884-85
    (1975); 
    Cervantes, 797 F.3d at 329
    . The agent had been told that Martinez-
    Aleman’s truck had recently crossed the border into the United States, and
    proximity to the border is “[o]ne of the vital elements in the reasonable
    suspicion test.” United States v. Jacquinot, 
    258 F.3d 423
    , 428 (5th Cir. 2001).
    Though Martinez-Aleman contends that the fact that the truck had passed
    through the border and a checkpoint without arousing suspicion cuts against
    a finding of reasonable suspicion, he offers no support for this proposition. In
    any event, the testimony at the suppression hearing reflected that it is common
    for agents to seize contraband from vehicles that have successfully passed
    through a port of entry and checkpoints and that it was not uncommon for drug
    sniffing dogs at checkpoints to miss drugs secreted in vehicles.
    Testimony at the hearing also established that Highway 67, where the
    agent encountered Martinez-Aleman, is a drug and alien smuggling route and
    that there had been an uptick in illegal activity on this road in recent years.
    Indeed, we have characterized that portion of Highway 67 as a “notorious
    smuggling route,” noting its “notorious and isolated character.” United States
    v. Gonzalez, 
    190 F.3d 668
    , 672 (5th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks and
    citation omitted).   Furthermore, the experience of the agents, which was
    2
    Case: 16-51400     Document: 00514129912      Page: 3    Date Filed: 08/24/2017
    No. 16-51400
    extensive, is entitled to “significant weight.” United States v. Ramirez, 
    839 F.3d 437
    , 440 (5th Cir. 2016).
    Martinez-Aleman’s unusual driving behavior further supports the
    legality of the stop. See 
    Cervantes, 797 F.3d at 329
    . When an agent first
    encountered Martinez-Aleman, he was driving approximately 20 to 30 miles
    per hour below the speed limit, which was suspicious. See United States v.
    Samaguey, 
    180 F.3d 195
    , 199 (5th Cir. 1999). After the agent began following
    Martinez-Aleman, his behavior suggested that he was trying to evade the
    agent. Martinez-Aleman pulled off the road into an obviously abandoned gas
    station. Immediately after the agent passed the gas station, Martinez-Aleman
    pulled away at a great enough speed that the agent had to accelerate quickly
    to keep up with him after the agent circled the block. Later, Martinez-Aleman
    made another evasive turn. Obvious attempts to evade agents can contribute
    to reasonable suspicion supporting a stop. 
    Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. at 885
    .
    Given the totality of the circumstances, there was reasonable suspicion
    for the stop, and the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress.
    See Cervantes, 
    797 F.3d 326
    , 328-29.         Though some of Martinez-Aleman’s
    actions were arguably consistent with innocent conduct, “[a] determination
    that reasonable suspicion exists . . . need not rule out the possibility of innocent
    conduct.” United States v. Arvizu, 
    534 U.S. 266
    , 277 (2002).
    The written judgment correctly states that Martinez-Aleman pleaded
    guilty to counts one and two in the indictment; however, it identifies only the
    offense in count one and omits the second count involving cocaine. The case is
    therefore remanded for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in
    the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See United
    States v. Johnson, 
    588 F.2d 961
    , 964 (5th Cir. 1979).
    AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT.
    3