-
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), rendered January 10, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the verdict was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see, GPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Resolution of issues of cred
*406 ibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 277 A.D.2d 405, 716 N.Y.S.2d 330
Filed Date: 11/20/2000
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2022