Lawrence Thompson v. Adrian Garcia ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 14-20505      Document: 00512937389         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/13/2015
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 14-20505                          February 13, 2015
    Lyle W. Cayce
    LAWRENCE EDWARD THOMPSON,                                                          Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    ADRIAN GARCIA; UNNAMED OTHER EMPLOYEES OF HARRIS COUNTY
    SHERIFF’S OFFICE; ARAMARK MAINTENANCE,
    Defendants-Appellees
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:14-CV-1624
    Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Lawrence Edward Thompson, Texas prisoner # 155240, moves for leave
    to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the district court’s dismissal
    without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to the three-
    strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under § 1915(g), a prisoner may not
    proceed IFP in a civil action or in an appeal of a judgment in a civil action if he
    has, on three or more occasions during his incarceration, brought an action or
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-20505     Document: 00512937389     Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/13/2015
    No. 14-20505
    appeal that was dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim, unless the
    prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thompson has
    failed to demonstrate that he was under imminent danger of serious physical
    injury at the time that he sought to file his complaint in the district court,
    proceed with his appeal, or move to proceed IFP. See § 1915(g); Banos v.
    O’Guin, 
    144 F.3d 883
    , 884 (5th Cir. 1998). Thompson’s motion for leave to
    proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH
    CIR. R. 42.2; Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
    , 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-20505

Filed Date: 2/13/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021