Michael Harasyn v. Gregory Krause , 599 F. App'x 607 ( 2015 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3171
___________________________
Michael Joseph Harasyn,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
Gregory Edward Krause; Kathleen Anne Krause; Betsy Lou Harasyn,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: April 3, 2015
Filed: April 8, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Harasyn appeals the district court’s1 dismissal, for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction, of his pro se complaint claiming his rights were violated in prior
divorce and child-custody proceedings in state court. Upon consideration of
Harasyn’s arguments on appeal, and upon careful de novo review of the district
court’s dismissal, see Edwards v. City of Jonesboro, 645 F.3d 1014, 1017 (8th Cir.
2011), we agree with the district court that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, see
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005), and we
find nothing improper in the proceedings below, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Minn.
Majority v. Manksy, 708 F.3d 1051, 1056 (8th Cir. 2013).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-