United States v. Rivera-Duran ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 01-50753
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JULIAN RIVERA-DURAN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. DR-01-CR-120-1
    --------------------
    March 25, 2002
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Julian Rivera-Duran appeals his sentence following his
    conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
    He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for
    a downward departure.   Rivera-Duran asserts that the district
    court’s denial of his departure motion was based on an error of
    law because the district court stated that it believed it did not
    have legal authority to grant the motion.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 01-50753
    -2-
    The district court originally stated that it did not know of
    legal authority that would allow it to grant the departure motion
    but later clarified this statement by saying it believed it had
    legal authority to grant the motion but declined to do so based
    on its interpretation of other cases.      Further review of the
    record also indicates that the district court was aware of
    Rivera-Duran’s specific circumstances.
    When a refusal to depart is based on the facts of a
    particular case, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction and the
    case should be dismissed.   See United States v. Lugman, 
    130 F.3d 113
    , 115 (5th Cir. 1997).   However, the appellate court will
    review the decision not to depart if the record indicates the
    district court based its decision on an error of law.      Id.; see
    also United States v. Landerman, 
    167 F.3d 895
    , 899 (5th Cir.
    1999).   Because the record does not indicate that the district
    court based its decision on an error of law, this court does not
    have jurisdiction and the appeal is DISMISSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-50753

Filed Date: 3/26/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021