United States v. Gomez-Ballesteros ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 17, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-50883
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    BENIGNO GOMEZ-BALLESTEROS, also
    known as Pedro Chavez,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:04-CR-462-ALL-DB
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Benigno Gomez-
    Ballesteros raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-
    Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    , 235 (1998), which held
    that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense, and by United
    States v. Pineiro, 
    377 F.3d 464
    , 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition
    for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held
    that Blakely v. Washington, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
     (2004), does not
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-50883
    -2-
    apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines.   The
    Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the
    judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.