United States v. Gonsales-Perez ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 24, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 02-41310
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    BERNARDO GONSALES-PEREZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. L-02-CR-380-3
    --------------------
    Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Bernardo Gonsales-Perez pleaded guilty to transporting
    aliens within the United States and was sentenced to 30 months
    of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.      On
    appeal, he argues that the district court erred by increasing
    his offense level by six pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(2)(B)
    because his offense involved transporting 31 aliens and by two
    pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5) because the offense involved
    the intentional or reckless creation of substantial risk of death
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-41310
    -2-
    or serious bodily injury because of the conditions in which the
    aliens were transported in the trucks.    The district court’s
    application of the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo,
    while its findings of fact are reviewed for clear error.    United
    States v. Harrington, 
    82 F.3d 83
    , 86 (5th Cir. 1996).   Gonsales-
    Perez has not shown that information that the district court
    relied on in sentencing him was materially untrue.    United States
    v. Puig-Infante, 
    19 F.3d 929
    , 943 (5th Cir. 1994).   Accordingly,
    he has not shown that the district court erred in sentencing him
    under the guidelines.   See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (relevant
    conduct); United States v. Cuyler, 
    298 F.3d 387
    , 389 (5th Cir.
    2002) (reckless endangerment).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-41310

Filed Date: 6/23/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021