United States v. Olguin ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS          April 22, 2003
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 02-40904
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    REYNALDO OLGUIN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:99-CR-56-2
    --------------------
    Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Reynaldo Olguin appeals from his sentence for conspiracy to
    distribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana in
    violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 846
    .   Olguin argues that (1) the
    district court erred in denying him a downward adjustment for
    acceptance of responsibility and (2) the district court erred in
    sentencing him to four years of supervised release.
    In light of Olguin’s failure to meet with a probation
    officer, failure to surrender, and provision of a false name to
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-40904
    -2-
    police officers, his case does not qualify as an extraordinary
    situation warranting adjustments for both obstruction of justice
    and acceptance of responsibility.   See United States v. Chapa-
    Garza, 
    62 F.3d 118
    , 123 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v.
    McDonald, 
    964 F.2d 390
    , 391 (5th Cir. 1992).
    Despite Olguin’s assertion to the contrary, the record shows
    that the district court expressly recognized that the statutory
    minimum sentence of four years of supervised release did not
    apply to him, because he qualified for a safety-valve reduction.
    See 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (f); U.S.S.G. § 5D1.2, comment. (n.2).
    Olguin’s sentence of four years of supervised release falls
    within the guideline range, U.S.S.G. § 5D1.2(a)(1), and he has
    demonstrated no error, plain or otherwise.     See United States v.
    Kelly, 
    974 F.2d 22
    , 24 (5th Cir. 1992).
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.