United States v. Brown ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-50007
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    EDWARD LOUIS BROWN, JR., also known as Edward Lewis Brown,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. W-97-CR-3-1
    --------------------
    August 2, 2002
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Edward Louis Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s
    revocation of his supervised release.   He argues that the
    district court abused its discretion in revoking his supervised
    release because the Government failed to offer sufficient
    evidence to establish the alleged violations of the conditions of
    supervision.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-50007
    -2-
    Supervised release may be revoked upon a finding, by a
    preponderance of the evidence, that a defendant violated a
    condition of his supervised release.     See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3);
    United States v. McCormick, 
    54 F.3d 214
    , 219 (5th Cir. 1995).
    This court reviews the district court’s decision for an abuse of
    discretion.   See 
    McCormick, 54 F.3d at 219
    .
    In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the
    evidence, this court views “the evidence and all reasonable
    inferences that may be drawn from the evidence in a light most
    favorable to the government.”     United States v. Alaniz-Alaniz, 
    38 F.3d 788
    , 792 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal citation omitted).
    Because of the clear conflicts between the testimony of the
    witnesses, the district court made implicit credibility
    determinations in reaching its decision.    This court does not
    pass on a district court’s determination as to the credibility of
    witnesses.    
    Id. at 791.
      Accepting all reasonable credibility
    choices that tend to support the decision, the evidence, when
    viewed in its entirety, is sufficient to establish that Brown
    violated the conditions of his supervised release.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-50007

Filed Date: 8/2/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021