Capers v. Dallas Independent School District , 165 F. App'x 332 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    January 31, 2006
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                                  Clerk
    No. 05-10578
    Summary Calendar
    SHEILA CAPERS
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, OSCAR RODRIGUEZ,
    LUIS COWLEY
    Defendants-Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for
    the Northern District of Texas
    (USDC No. 3:03-cv-1305)
    _________________________________________________________
    Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*1
    Reviewing the summary judgment order de novo, we affirm the district court’s
    decision for the following reasons:
    *Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should
    not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
    5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    1.    To establish a prima facie case of retaliation, Capers must show (1) that she
    engaged in an activity protected by Title VII, (2) that an adverse employment
    action occurred, and (3) that a causal link existed between the protected activity
    and the adverse employment action. Roberson v. Alltel Info. Servs., 
    373 F.3d 647
    ,
    655 (5th Cir. 2004).
    2.    Capers did not demonstrate an adverse employment action and she therefore failed
    to make out her prima facie case. On August 9, 1999, Capers entered into a three-
    year term contract with the Dallas Independent School District. Capers is
    therefore    mistaken in her argument that she was a continuous contract employee
    when the     school board put her on a term of “probation.” To be demoted from a term
    contract to a probationary contract requires the written consent of the teacher.
    TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN § 21.106 (Vernon 2006). Since no such written consent
    was ever requested or given, Capers was not demoted to a probationary contract.
    There is no indication that her employment status as a term contract employee was
    otherwise affected by the decision of the school board to place her on probation.
    Affirmed.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-10578

Citation Numbers: 165 F. App'x 332

Judges: Davis, Per Curiam, Prado, Reavley

Filed Date: 2/1/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023