Equipment Holding Co. v. Commissioner , 439 F. App'x 368 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 09-60866     Document: 00511585815         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/29/2011
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    August 29, 2011
    No. 09-60866                          Lyle W. Cayce
    Summary Calendar                             Clerk
    EQUIPMENT HOLDING COMPANY, L.L.C.; RONALD J. ADAMS,
    Petitioners - Appellees
    v.
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
    Respondent - Appellant
    Appeal from the Decision of
    the United States Tax Court
    No. 18737-07
    Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Appellant Commissioner of Internal Revenue appeals from a final order
    of the Tax Court. The sole issue presented is whether an understatement of
    income resulting from an overstatement of the tax basis of sold property can
    qualify as an omission from gross income giving rise to the extended, six-year
    period for tax assessment. A panel of this Court has decided this question on
    facts materially identical to the facts in the instant case and concluded that such
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 09-60866   Document: 00511585815     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/29/2011
    No. 09-60866
    an overstatement does not trigger the extended six-year assessment period in
    the Tax Code, 
    26 U.S.C. § 6501
    (e)(1)(A). Burks v. United States, 
    633 F.3d 347
    (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed, (Aug 11, 2011)(NO. 11-178, 11A9).      The
    argument presented by the Commissioner is foreclosed by our circuit precedent,
    and the Commissioner recognizes the binding precedent, but nevertheless argues
    that Burks was wrongly decided to preserve the issue in the event the Supreme
    Court grants certiorari and reverses, vacates, or otherwise disturbs our decision
    in Burks. This panel is bound by our precedent.
    The judgment of the Tax Court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-60866

Citation Numbers: 439 F. App'x 368

Judges: Benavides, Clement, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 8/29/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023